The planning phase of the ACGME-I Self-Study process involves several actions that include, defining a Self-Study committee aggregating and analyzing data from Annual Program Evaluations; and using that information to determine program strengths and areas in need of further development.
ACGME-I does not have specific requirements for who should be members of the Self-Study committee. The decision about the membership of the committee, how often they meet, and the overall plan for conducting the Self-Study is the responsibility of the program director; however, it is recommended that a wide net of stakeholders be involved throughout the process, such as:
Often, the designated institutional official (DIO) of the Sponsoring Institution is directly involved in the Self-Study process. Remember, core residency programs and fellowship programs are evaluated together. It is therefore best if the Self-Study committee or the core residency program includes representation from any affiliated fellowships, and that the Self-Study committee for a fellowship program includes representation from the core residency program. Other members might include departmental leaders, chief residents, and experts in education, curriculum design, or assessment. The DIO may be able to provide suggestions for institutional experts.
Data for the Self-Study is information from successive Annual Program Evaluations. Data aggregated and evaluated should include: 1) improvements that have been completed in the last five years; 2) how any active citations have been addressed; and, 3) how the program’s aims are being addressed. Additional information from residents, program graduates, employers, or faculty members may be needed to conduct a thorough evaluation. For example, if one of the program’s aims is to educate physicians who provide high quality primary care, a discussion with senior residents on their plans following the residency and/or a graduate or graduate employer survey may be necessary.
Once data has been aggregated and analyzed, the Self-Study committee should use the analysis to determine areas that need further development. This analysis should consider the program’s environment, including external factors and/or any threats that may limit program success. The program may consider conducting a SWOT analysis to determine its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, and aims. Engagement of stakeholders, such as faculty members, residents/fellows, and, in the case of a subspecialty program, leadership form the core residency program, is a critical component to validate the committee’s assessment.
Suggested Annual Program Evaluation Action Plan and Follow-Up Template
Examples of External Factors and Areas Needing Development